5 Simple Statements About HP38 powde Explained
5 Simple Statements About HP38 powde Explained
Blog Article
Why? For the reason that I have an excessive amount time on my palms, a great deal of HP38 and 124gr bullets And that i basically can not quit tinkering. I just desire to check if I can perform it.
With in the vicinity of max masses I always back again it off when switching to a new lots of powder. Decades in the past there was converse online of big variation in RE19. My .338 Winchester at some time chrono graphed hundreds at less than max demand higher in velocity than what the e-book had for max masses.
Though not nearly as expert with rifle powders as pistol I have already been delighted to discover the two the effectiveness by my AR, M1A and in some cases my M1 Garand to get more than ample for my needs with accuracy much better than my previous Maritime eyes and metering properties I like. I haven't tried it in my Springfield ’03, M1 Carbine or USMC M40A1 and with the probable exception from the M40A1 I probably won’t this calendar year.
!) but….I wasn’t ready to component Along with the hundreds and many pounds. I will regret this I’m absolutely sure. I would like Nosler 168 grain Competitiveness bullets. Have a very new rifle I’m increase and never ample bullets for all my 30 cals.
Also, given that I cast and shoot almost only Forged, I was serious about striving Solo1k for getting clear of a few of the smoke I get with BE. Any one understand how incredibly hot HP38 burns? And the smoke success I need to expect when loading HP38 with Solid bullets?
Many thanks Chuck, I preferred BE because it worked very well for 40 Major, 9 Slight and 45. And I detailed hp38 being an alternate on my get because it seemed that it was very similar to BE. The eight# jug will most likely last me a few calendar year so will likely be protected for a while but confident would like a cleaner, slower burning powder.
W231 (or vice versa in order to look at it that way). Hodgdon and Winchester both buy the powder through the identical OEM producer, the only real variance could be the canister wherein it's bought.
identified bullseye and crimson dot always much more correct and cleaner.so I've 50 percent a pound still left that .i will expend .dont think I'll get it once again.I'm hoping i like titegroup greater as wasnt capable uncover any bullseye so purchased a pound of it to try.couple of months back identified some bullseye so im excellent on that.what i want to know is an individual established masses with 158 lead in 38 cases and titegroup. knowledge on bottle claims 3.eight grns could make 920 fps.i wonder if that is exact information.for sure I'll only load a number of and try not fifty.GSPMAN
Nothing there signifies They are really a similar powders, or are even of the identical manufacture, or have like cost weights in almost any particular software.
Now…taking a look at a lot of a article on using both of these milsurp powders…and knowing which i frequently use heavier bullets for my three hundred WinMag’s.(180gr to 190 hp-38 powder gr Sierra BTHP) and 168gr bullets from the seven RemMag’s….I’m hoping these will operate as sought after.
Bullseye is a tricky act to comply with, but I believe it's reasonable to mention that Hodgdon HP-38 has finished a really admirable occupation of it and is also nipping on the heels of Bullseye.
I am aware for a proven fact that Ramshot Enforcer and Exact 4100 are equivalent powders - different labels. I have verified this by my own load growth along with a chronograph.
I do not think your hp-38 powder difficulty is relevant to using HP38/231 but instead the hardness in the commercially generated bullets.
Any one ever use WC867 and/or WC872? I did see in which these are definitely really slow buring powders as a result….major bullets and whole hundreds.